Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753959AbcKINPM (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2016 08:15:12 -0500 Received: from ud10.udmedia.de ([194.117.254.50]:54458 "EHLO mail.ud10.udmedia.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752259AbcKINPK (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2016 08:15:10 -0500 Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 14:15:05 +0100 From: Markus Trippelsdorf To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Namhyung Kim , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Jiri Olsa , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] perf tools: Assorted fixes for hierarchy mode Message-ID: <20161109131505.GD14552@x4> References: <20161108130833.9263-1-namhyung@kernel.org> <20161108134358.GB14552@x4> <20161108151023.GC14552@x4> <20161109131041.GB12125@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161109131041.GB12125@kernel.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1352 Lines: 32 On 2016.11.09 at 10:10 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:10:23PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf escreveu: > > On 2016.11.09 at 00:05 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:43 PM, Markus Trippelsdorf > > > wrote: > > > > On 2016.11.08 at 22:08 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > > > >> This patches fix problems in hierarchy output Markus reported some > > > >> time ago. The code is available on the 'perf/hierarchy-fix-v1' branch > > > >> in my tree: > > > > >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/namhyung/linux-perf.git > > > > >> Any feedbacks are welcomed. > > > > > By the way, I hope that: > > > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git/commit/?h=perf/core&id=8a06b0be6507f97f3aa92ca814335b8b65fd3de2 > > > > doesn't fall through the cracks. > > > > What do you mean? It's already in the tip/perf/core so will be merged > > > to the mainline eventually. > > > Ok. I was just wondering, because it sits there for two weeks already... > > If you think something qualifies for perf/urgent, i.e. to go to a kernel > that is in -rc stage, v4.9-rc4 now, for instance, please point that out > and I'll consider it. Because "perf top --hierarchy" is new in 4.9, I think all fixes for that feature qualify for perf/urgent by default. -- Markus