Date: Tue, 06 May 2003 22:53:42 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <20030506.225342.68058619.davem@redhat.com>
To: thomas@horsten.com
Cc: hch@infradead.org, voidcartman@yahoo.com, marcelo@conectiva.com.br,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.4.21-rc1: byteorder.h breaks with __STRICT_ANSI__
 defined (trivial)
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <200305070759.49121.thomas@horsten.com>
References: <200305070744.27207.thomas@horsten.com>
	<20030507074557.A9197@infradead.org>
	<200305070759.49121.thomas@horsten.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 797
Lines: 19

   From: Thomas Horsten <thomas@horsten.com>
   Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 07:59:49 +0100

   On Wednesday 07 May 2003 7:45 am, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
   > That's highly broken because his libc was compiled against 2.2 headers.
   > You must never use different headers in /usr/include/Pasm,linux}
   > then those your libc was compiled against.
   
   I don't see why moving up should be wrong -

The headers used for 2.2.x era libc cannot cope with or conflit with
many of the constructs used by current kernel headers.

Chritoph's points are very real.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/