Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754591AbcKJD2Z (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2016 22:28:25 -0500 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:46122 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754530AbcKJD2W (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2016 22:28:22 -0500 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.1 smtp.codeaurora.org 1D69F61406 Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sricharan@codeaurora.org From: "Sricharan" To: "'Rajendra Nayak'" , "'Stephen Boyd'" Cc: , , , , References: <1477304297-5248-1-git-send-email-sricharan@codeaurora.org> <1477304297-5248-4-git-send-email-sricharan@codeaurora.org> <20161103203418.GA16026@codeaurora.org> <006701d2367b$19a6ba00$4cf42e00$@codeaurora.org> <20161104201836.GE16026@codeaurora.org> <58201597.6010207@codeaurora.org> <20161108223336.GK16026@codeaurora.org> <000301d23aaa$3f5dd110$be197330$@codeaurora.org> <5823DC3E.2060106@codeaurora.org> In-Reply-To: <5823DC3E.2060106@codeaurora.org> Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3] clk: qcom: Set BRANCH_HALT_DELAY flags for venus core0/1 clks Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 08:58:13 +0530 Message-ID: <001701d23b02$7bf7daa0$73e78fe0$@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0 Thread-Index: AQG+FfkBp35ZYGVHUWKvPRGPq/wjNgG2MEYIAVCmbzIBZpOVcgFQ2/nWAbvTGY0CGwJzkAGBP0q3ALIJHxGgm5U+AA== Content-Language: en-us Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 671 Lines: 25 Hi Rajendra, > >>> >>> The proper sequence sounds like it should be: >>> >>> 1. Enable GDSC for main domain >>> 2. Enable clocks for main domain (video_{core,maxi,ahb,axi}_clk) >>> 3. Write the two registers to assert hw signal for subdomains >>> 4. Enable GDSCs for two subdomains >>> 5. Enable clocks for subdomains (video_subcore{0,1}_clk) >>> >[].. > >> >> So the above is the sequence which is actually carried out on the >> firmware side. The same can be done in host as well. > >By the 'above sequence is done on firmware side', I hope you don;t mean *all* 5 steps. >I guess you mean only step 3 is done by firmware? > Yes, only step 3. Regards, Sricharan