Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753020AbcKJFRw (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Nov 2016 00:17:52 -0500 Received: from host.buserror.net ([209.198.135.123]:53851 "EHLO host.buserror.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750992AbcKJFRt (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Nov 2016 00:17:49 -0500 Message-ID: <1478755050.21746.8.camel@buserror.net> From: Scott Wood To: "Y.B. Lu" , Ulf Hansson Cc: linux-mmc , Arnd Bergmann , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-clk , "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Mark Rutland , Rob Herring , Russell King , Jochen Friedrich , Joerg Roedel , Claudiu Manoil , Bhupesh Sharma , Qiang Zhao , Kumar Gala , Leo Li , "X.B. Xie" , "M.H. Lian" Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2016 23:17:30 -0600 In-Reply-To: References: <1478661252-42439-1-git-send-email-yangbo.lu@nxp.com> <1478750114.21746.4.camel@buserror.net> Organization: NXP Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.2-0ubuntu3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 50.171.225.118 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: oss@buserror.net X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.0 KHOP_BIG_TO_CC Sent to 10+ recipients instaed of Bcc or a list * -15 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Subject: Re: [v16, 0/7] Fix eSDHC host version register bug X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:57:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on host.buserror.net) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 7122 Lines: 146 On Thu, 2016-11-10 at 04:11 +0000, Y.B. Lu wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Y.B. Lu > > Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 12:06 PM > > To: 'Scott Wood'; Ulf Hansson > > Cc: linux-mmc; Arnd Bergmann; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; > > devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux- > > kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-clk; iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org; > > netdev@vger.kernel.org; Greg Kroah-Hartman; Mark Rutland; Rob Herring; > > Russell King; Jochen Friedrich; Joerg Roedel; Claudiu Manoil; Bhupesh > > Sharma; Qiang Zhao; Kumar Gala; Leo Li; X.B. Xie; M.H. Lian > > Subject: RE: [v16, 0/7] Fix eSDHC host version register bug > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-mmc- > > > owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Scott Wood > > > Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 11:55 AM > > > To: Ulf Hansson; Y.B. Lu > > > Cc: linux-mmc; Arnd Bergmann; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; > > > devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; > > > linux- kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-clk; > > > iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org; Greg > > > Kroah-Hartman; Mark Rutland; Rob Herring; Russell King; Jochen > > > Friedrich; Joerg Roedel; Claudiu Manoil; Bhupesh Sharma; Qiang Zhao; > > > Kumar Gala; Leo Li; X.B. Xie; M.H. Lian > > > Subject: Re: [v16, 0/7] Fix eSDHC host version register bug > > > > > > On Wed, 2016-11-09 at 19:27 +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > > > > > > > - i2c-list > > > > > > > > On 9 November 2016 at 04:14, Yangbo Lu wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This patchset is used to fix a host version register bug in the > > > > > T4240- > > > > > R1.0-R2.0 > > > > > eSDHC controller. To match the SoC version and revision, 15 > > > > > previous version patchsets had tried many methods but all of them > > > > > were rejected by reviewers. > > > > > Such as > > > > >         - dts compatible method > > > > >         - syscon method > > > > >         - ifdef PPC method > > > > >         - GUTS driver getting SVR method Anrd suggested a > > > > > soc_device_match method in v10, and this is the only available > > > > > method left now. This v11 patchset introduces the soc_device_match > > > > > interface in soc driver. > > > > > > > > > > The first four patches of Yangbo are to add the GUTS driver. This > > > > > is used to register a soc device which contain soc version and > > > > > revision information. > > > > > The other three patches introduce the soc_device_match method in > > > > > soc driver and apply it on esdhc driver to fix this bug. > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > Changes for v15: > > > > >         - Dropped patch 'dt: bindings: update Freescale DCFG > > > compatible' > > > > > > > > > > > > > >           since the work had been done by below patch on > > > > > ShawnGuo's linux tree. > > > > >           'dt-bindings: fsl: add LS1043A/LS1046A/LS2080A > > > > > compatible for SCFG > > > > >            and DCFG' > > > > >         - Fixed error code issue in guts driver Changes for v16: > > > > >         - Dropped patch 'powerpc/fsl: move mpc85xx.h to > > > include/linux/fsl' > > > > > > > > > > > > > >         - Added a bug-fix patch from Geert > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > > > Arnd Bergmann (1): > > > > >   base: soc: introduce soc_device_match() interface > > > > > > > > > > Geert Uytterhoeven (1): > > > > >   base: soc: Check for NULL SoC device attributes > > > > > > > > > > Yangbo Lu (5): > > > > >   ARM64: dts: ls2080a: add device configuration node > > > > >   dt: bindings: move guts devicetree doc out of powerpc directory > > > > >   soc: fsl: add GUTS driver for QorIQ platforms > > > > >   MAINTAINERS: add entry for Freescale SoC drivers > > > > >   mmc: sdhci-of-esdhc: fix host version for T4240-R1.0-R2.0 > > > > > > > > > >  .../bindings/{powerpc => soc}/fsl/guts.txt         |   3 + > > > > >  MAINTAINERS                                        |  11 +- > > > > >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls2080a.dtsi     |   6 + > > > > >  drivers/base/Kconfig                               |   1 + > > > > >  drivers/base/soc.c                                 |  70 ++++++ > > > > >  drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig                           |   1 + > > > > >  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c                  |  20 ++ > > > > >  drivers/soc/Kconfig                                |   3 +- > > > > >  drivers/soc/fsl/Kconfig                            |  18 ++ > > > > >  drivers/soc/fsl/Makefile                           |   1 + > > > > >  drivers/soc/fsl/guts.c                             | 236 > > > > > +++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > >  include/linux/fsl/guts.h                           | 125 > > > > > ++++++----- > > > > >  include/linux/sys_soc.h                            |   3 + > > > > >  13 files changed, 447 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-) > > > > >  rename Documentation/devicetree/bindings/{powerpc => > > > > > soc}/fsl/guts.txt > > > > > (91%) > > > > >  create mode 100644 drivers/soc/fsl/Kconfig > > > > >  create mode 100644 drivers/soc/fsl/guts.c > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > 2.1.0.27.g96db324 > > > > > > > > > Thanks, applied on my mmc tree for next! > > > > > > > > I noticed that some DT compatibles weren't documented, according to > > > > checkpatch. Please fix that asap! > > > They are documented, in fsl/guts.txt (the file moved in patch 2/7): > > > > > > > >  - compatible : Should define the compatible device type for > > > >    global-utilities. > > > >    Possible compatibles: > > > >         "fsl,qoriq-device-config-1.0" > > > >         "fsl,qoriq-device-config-2.0" > > > >         "fsl,-device-config" > > > >         "fsl,-guts" > > > Checkpatch doesn't understand compatibles defined in such a way. > > [Lu Yangbo-B47093] You're right, Scott. I dropped DT patch 'dt: bindings: > > update Freescale DCFG compatible ' > > which fixed un-doc issue since Shaohui had done this on Shawn Guo's tree. > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/shawnguo/linux.git/commit/?h > > =imx/dt64&id=981034a2bfcaff5c95dafde24d7abfe7f9025c19 > > > > Thanks. > [Lu Yangbo-B47093] Both 'fsl,-guts' and 'fsl,-dcfg' would have > no un-doc issue after Shaohui's patch are pulled :) I don't follow.  The link above points to a patch that addresses -dcfg and -scfg, not -device-config or -guts -- and it also doesn't do it in a manner that checkpatch will understand. In any case, I wouldn't call this an "un-doc issue" -- it is documented -- but rather a checkpatch-friendliness issue. -Scott