Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755493AbcKJLoF (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Nov 2016 06:44:05 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:39612 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754939AbcKJLoD (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Nov 2016 06:44:03 -0500 Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 12:44:11 +0100 From: Greg KH To: "Levy, Amir (Jer)" Cc: "andreas.noever@gmail.com" , "bhelgaas@google.com" , "corbet@lwn.net" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , "mario_limonciello@dell.com" , thunderbolt-linux , "Westerberg, Mika" , "Winkler, Tomas" , "Zhang, Xiong Y" Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/8] thunderbolt: Introducing Thunderbolt(TM) Networking Message-ID: <20161110114411.GA4155@kroah.com> References: <1478701208-4585-1-git-send-email-amir.jer.levy@intel.com> <20161109160219.GB9111@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 556 Lines: 16 On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:39:19AM +0000, Levy, Amir (Jer) wrote: > > And how about getting some internal-Intel kernel developers to review and > > sign-off on this code? Don't make the community do the review when you > > have access to resources like this. You have an internal mailing list for this > > very purpose, use it! > > > > The review with the internal-Intel kernel developers was done before submitting > the first patch set. Then why is their signed-off-by:s not on the patchset showing that they "bless" this series? thanks, greg k-h