Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755583AbcKJLsz convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Nov 2016 06:48:55 -0500 Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:10873 "EHLO mga04.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755514AbcKJLsw (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Nov 2016 06:48:52 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,618,1473145200"; d="scan'208";a="29653599" From: "Levy, Amir (Jer)" To: Greg KH CC: "andreas.noever@gmail.com" , "bhelgaas@google.com" , "corbet@lwn.net" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , "mario_limonciello@dell.com" , thunderbolt-linux , "Westerberg, Mika" , "Winkler, Tomas" , "Zhang, Xiong Y" Subject: RE: [PATCH v9 0/8] thunderbolt: Introducing Thunderbolt(TM) Networking Thread-Topic: [PATCH v9 0/8] thunderbolt: Introducing Thunderbolt(TM) Networking Thread-Index: AQHSOoO1E33Xz8/iJ0iynfF+yxmEQqDQrr2AgAFpIwD//+ETgIAAIrgQ Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 11:48:45 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1478701208-4585-1-git-send-email-amir.jer.levy@intel.com> <20161109160219.GB9111@kroah.com> <20161110114411.GA4155@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20161110114411.GA4155@kroah.com> Accept-Language: he-IL, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.184.70.10] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 649 Lines: 20 On Thu, Nov 10 2016, 01:44 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:39:19AM +0000, Levy, Amir (Jer) wrote: > > > And how about getting some internal-Intel kernel developers to > > > review and sign-off on this code? Don't make the community do the > > > review when you have access to resources like this. You have an > > > internal mailing list for this very purpose, use it! > > > > > > > The review with the internal-Intel kernel developers was done before > > submitting the first patch set. > > Then why is their signed-off-by:s not on the patchset showing that they > "bless" this series? > Working on it. > thanks, > > greg k-h