Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 13:24:13 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Shiva Kerdel <shiva@exdev.nl>
Cc: stuart.yoder@nxp.com, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
        German.Rivera@freescale.com, nipun.gupta@nxp.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, german.rivera@nxp.com,
        treding@nvidia.com, itai.katz@nxp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Staging: fsl-mc: include: mc-bus: Kernel type
 's16' preferred over 'int16_t'
Message-ID: <20161110122413.GA7704@kroah.com>
References: <20161108154214.16243-1-shiva@exdev.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20161108154214.16243-1-shiva@exdev.nl>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 586
Lines: 19

On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:42:13PM +0100, Shiva Kerdel wrote:
> Follow the kernel type preferrences of using 's16' over 'int16_t'.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shiva Kerdel <shiva@exdev.nl>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/fsl-mc/include/mc-bus.h | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

What is different from your v1 patch?

I'm confused now, I have two different series from you, one 6 patches
long, and one 2 patches long, claiming to do the same thing.

I've dropped them both from my patch review queue and please, resend
what you really want me to apply :)

thanks,

greg k-h