Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S934576AbcKJPyX (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 10 Nov 2016 10:54:23 -0500
Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:33598 "EHLO
        Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S934327AbcKJPyW (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 10 Nov 2016 10:54:22 -0500
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 16:54:10 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: "Charles (Chas) Williams" <ciwillia@Brocade.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        "M. Vefa Bicakci" <m.v.b@runbox.com>,
        "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/cpuid: Deal with broken firmware once more
Message-ID: <20161110155408.wtxaxneg77xc6apa@linutronix.de>
References: <e3a6f9cb-ee46-6e5c-7b2e-9a6ed2fc949e@brocade.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1611081525160.3501@nanos>
 <86609338-2b45-ed7e-fb07-99421e43a2f1@brocade.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1611081721330.3501@nanos>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1611091613540.3501@nanos>
 <49fe8cc5-0f0f-6cac-7a5c-803e81f5667d@runbox.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1611101125090.3501@nanos>
 <b5f6e797-580b-3c16-c89c-ec16cce084c5@oracle.com>
 <eecbbfdf-38c1-acdd-402b-3be48cf5fdb7@brocade.com>
 <cc8425f3-23df-a9e7-bc01-db6b529f96e5@oracle.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <cc8425f3-23df-a9e7-bc01-db6b529f96e5@oracle.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20161014 (1.7.1)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 407
Lines: 12

On 2016-11-10 10:31:20 [-0500], Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> For Xen, we recently added a6a198bc60e6 ("xen/x86: Update topology map
> for PV VCPUs") to at least temporarily work around some topology map
> problems that PV guests have with RAPL (which I think is what Vefa's
> problem was).

I wouldn't blame it on RAPL. It is RAPL that exposes the wrong APICID
<-> CPU <-> Package mapping.

> -boris

Sebastian