Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 12:38:10 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Waiman Long <waiman.long@hpe.com>, Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com>,
        Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
        Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>, Terry Rudd <terry.rudd@hpe.com>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>, Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>,
        Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v4 1/8] locking/drm: Kill mutex trickery
Message-ID: <20161111113810.GF3117@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20161007145243.361481786@infradead.org>
 <20161007150210.927453282@infradead.org>
 <20161018124841.GW3117@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20161018125718.GG3157@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <CAKMK7uGEwqOR2B-8eWCAu55K7n_ZHJRHeP971TKsrE4tp6Ge+w@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAKMK7uGEwqOR2B-8eWCAu55K7n_ZHJRHeP971TKsrE4tp6Ge+w@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 420
Lines: 10

On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:22:02PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:

> Once all your locking rework is assembled it might be good to have a
> topic branch I could pull in. Both for testing and to handle conflicts
> before it goes boom in the merge window ;-) Not necessary ofc, but I
> think it'd be useful.

Everything except the trylock_recursive is already in tip/locking/core.

Ingo, is that all there is in that branch?