Message-ID: <5825C712.5050009@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 21:26:42 +0800
From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: agustinv@codeaurora.org
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
        lenb@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, jason@lakedaemon.net,
        marc.zyngier@arm.com, timur@codeaurora.org, cov@codeaurora.org,
        agross@codeaurora.org, harba@codeaurora.org, jcm@redhat.com,
        msalter@redhat.com, mlangsdo@redhat.com, ahs3@redhat.com,
        astone@redhat.com, graeme.gregory@linaro.org, guohanjun@huawei.com,
        charles.garcia-tobin@arm.com,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
        Gabriele Paoloni <gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com>,
        Shameerali Kolothum Thodi 
        <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 2/3] ACPI: Add support for ResourceSource/IRQ domain
 mapping
References: <1477687696-1509-1-git-send-email-agustinv@codeaurora.org> <1477687696-1509-3-git-send-email-agustinv@codeaurora.org> <42ff0a81-7836-11f6-58e0-979bd1d0be20@linaro.org> <60c1d53146c0aebd3a05095823229224@codeaurora.org>
In-Reply-To: <60c1d53146c0aebd3a05095823229224@codeaurora.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1787
Lines: 49

On 11/10/2016 11:02 PM, agustinv@codeaurora.org wrote:
> Hey Hanjun,
>
> On 2016-11-09 21:36, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> Hi Marc, Rafael, Lorenzo,
>>
>> Since we agreed to add a probe deferral if we failed to get irq
>> resources which mirroring the DT does (patch 1 in this patch set),
>> I think the last blocker to make things work both for Agustin and
>> me [1] is this patch, which makes the interrupt producer and consumer
>> work in ACPI, we have two different solution for one thing, we'd happy
>> to work together for one solution, could you give some suggestions
>> please?
>>
>> [1]:
>> https://mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1257419.html
>>
>> Agustin, I have some comments below.
>>
>> On 2016/10/29 4:48, Agustin Vega-Frias wrote:
>>> This allows irqchip drivers to associate an ACPI DSDT device to
>>> an IRQ domain and provides support for using the ResourceSource
>>> in Extended IRQ Resources to find the domain and map the IRQs
>>> specified on that domain.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Agustin Vega-Frias <agustinv@codeaurora.org>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/acpi/Makefile    |   1 +
>>>  drivers/acpi/irqdomain.c | 119
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>
>> Could we just reuse the gsi.c and not introduce a new
>> file, probably we can change the gsi.c to irqdomain.c
>> or something similar, then reuse the code in gsi.c.
>
> I was thinking just that after we chatted off-list.

Great.

> I might revisit and see what I come up with given that we already have
> a device argument and we could pass the IRQ source there.

Sorry, I'm little confused here, why we "already have a device
argument"? in drivers/acpi/resource.c, it just use NULL as device
and we can't pass dev directly for the API is using now, could
you explain more?

Thanks
Hanjun