Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756816AbcKKSuc (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Nov 2016 13:50:32 -0500 Received: from mail-it0-f48.google.com ([209.85.214.48]:37584 "EHLO mail-it0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754651AbcKKSua (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Nov 2016 13:50:30 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <40f2bfb8-fa81-f21a-551b-c559bf0a0048@oracle.com> References: <1478887253-3651-1-git-send-email-deepa.kernel@gmail.com> <40f2bfb8-fa81-f21a-551b-c559bf0a0048@oracle.com> From: Deepa Dinamani Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 10:50:29 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] fs: jfs: Replace CURRENT_TIME_SEC by current_time() To: Dave Kleikamp Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, Arnd Bergmann , y2038 Mailman List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 628 Lines: 16 On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Dave Kleikamp wrote: > On 11/11/2016 12:00 PM, Deepa Dinamani wrote: >> jfs uses nanosecond granularity for filesystem timestamps. >> Only this assignment is not using nanosecond granularity. >> Use current_time() to get the right granularity. > > I had thought these were being handled as a group. I'll push this one > through the jfs tree. Yes, that was the original plan. Then, Greg suggested pushing only the big patches as a group and sending individual filesystem patches separately. Big patches introducing current_time() have been merged in 4.9 rc1. -Deepa