Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264061AbTEGRTn (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 May 2003 13:19:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264072AbTEGRTn (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 May 2003 13:19:43 -0400 Received: from air-2.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:26071 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264061AbTEGRTm (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 May 2003 13:19:42 -0400 Message-Id: <200305071732.h47HW7W32160@mail.osdl.org> Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 10:32:03 -0700 (PDT) From: markw@osdl.org Subject: Re: OSDL DBT-2 AS vs. Deadline 2.5.68-mm2 To: gandalf@wlug.westbo.se cc: akpm@digeo.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1052326742.24206.16.camel@tux.rsn.bth.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1975 Lines: 38 On 7 May, Martin Josefsson wrote: > On Wed, 2003-05-07 at 18:33, markw@osdl.org wrote: >> I've collected some data from STP to see if it's useful or if there's >> anything else that would be useful to collect. I've got some tests >> queued up for the newer patches, but I wanted to put out what I had so >> far. >> >> >> METRICS OVER LAST 20 MINUTES: >> --------------- -------- ----- ---- -------- ----------------------------------- >> Kernel Elevator NOTPM CPU% Blocks/s URL >> --------------- -------- ----- ---- -------- ----------------------------------- >> 2.5.68-mm2 as 1155 94.3 8940.2 http://khack.osdl.org/stp/271356/ >> 2.5.68-mm2 deadline 1255 94.9 9598.7 http://khack.osdl.org/stp/271359/ >> >> FUNCTIONS SORTED BY TICKS: >> -- ------------------------- ------- ------------------------- ------- >> # as 2.5.68-mm2 ticks deadline 2.5.68-mm2 ticks >> -- ------------------------- ------- ------------------------- ------- >> 1 default_idle 6103428 default_idle 5359025 >> 2 bounce_copy_vec 86272 bounce_copy_vec 97696 >> 3 schedule 63819 schedule 70114 >> 4 __make_request 30397 __blk_queue_bounce 31167 >> 5 __blk_queue_bounce 26962 scsi_request_fn 26623 >> 6 scsi_request_fn 24845 __make_request 25012 > > You are using scsi, what tcq depth are you using? AS doesn't like >4 or > something like that. I'm told that it's set to 128 with this bit of code: if(dev->tagged_supported) scsi_adjust_queue_depth(dev, MSG_ORDERED_TAG, 128); - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/