Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934456AbcKLFVW (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Nov 2016 00:21:22 -0500 Received: from mail-qt0-f178.google.com ([209.85.216.178]:34340 "EHLO mail-qt0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751643AbcKLFVU (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Nov 2016 00:21:20 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <85bf45982709e06f7f42e1b8f8315945e9d9b6d0.1478858983.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> From: Viresh Kumar Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 10:51:19 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] cpufreq: schedutil: move slow path from workqueue to SCHED_FIFO task To: Tommaso Cucinotta Cc: Rafael Wysocki , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Lists linaro-kernel , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Vincent Guittot , Juri Lelli , Robin Randhawa , Steve Muckle Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 308 Lines: 8 On 11 November 2016 at 20:02, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > would you have an insight, as to what runtime/deadline/period to set, and/or > what specific timing constraints you'd like to set, just for this cpufreq > slowpath work? I don't have any such figures for not at least :(