Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263204AbTEGSrx (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 May 2003 14:47:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264177AbTEGSrw (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 May 2003 14:47:52 -0400 Received: from mail.skjellin.no ([80.239.42.67]:2697 "HELO mail.skjellin.no") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S263204AbTEGSrw convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 May 2003 14:47:52 -0400 From: "Andre Tomt" To: Subject: RE: 2.4.21-rc1 "breaks" older procps Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 21:02:32 +0200 Message-ID: <000e01c314cb$36b82420$0a01ff0a@slurv> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4024 In-Reply-To: <000d01c314c9$4afb96d0$0a01ff0a@slurv> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 708 Lines: 20 In my great tradition on replying to my own posts, here's another one. > The IDE changes that went into 2.4.21-pre seems to make older > procps unhappy, at least the one in Debian 3.0r1 (latest > stable). Upgrading to a newer procps seems to fix this, but > is this breakage really needed? "Breaking" stable debian > userland is not very nice :-) I forgot to mention what procps version I was using, it is 2.0.7 debian patchlevel 9. -- Cheers, Andr? Tomt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/