Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S938786AbcKNFhU (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Nov 2016 00:37:20 -0500 Received: from mail-pf0-f172.google.com ([209.85.192.172]:36205 "EHLO mail-pf0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932717AbcKNFhP (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Nov 2016 00:37:15 -0500 Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 11:07:11 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar To: Saravana Kannan Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Rafael Wysocki , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Lists linaro-kernel , Linux PM , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Vincent Guittot , Juri Lelli , Robin Randhawa , Steve Muckle Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] cpufreq: schedutil: move slow path from workqueue to SCHED_FIFO task Message-ID: <20161114053710.GA4178@vireshk-i7> References: <85bf45982709e06f7f42e1b8f8315945e9d9b6d0.1478858983.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> <582670FD.7080203@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 698 Lines: 18 On 12-11-16, 10:57, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 12 November 2016 at 07:01, Saravana Kannan wrote: > > Hold on a sec. I thought during LPC someone (Peter?) made a point that when > > RT thread run, we should bump the frequency to max? > > I wasn't there but AFAIU, this is the case we have currently for the schedutil > governor. And we (mobile world, Linaro) want to change that it doesn't work > that well for us. So perhaps it is just the opposite of what you stated. > > > So, schedutil is going > > to trigger schedutil to bump up the frequency to max, right? > > How is that question related to this patch ? Trash my last email, I failed to read yours :( -- viresh