Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 25 Feb 2001 14:25:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 25 Feb 2001 14:25:04 -0500 Received: from penguin.e-mind.com ([195.223.140.120]:51808 "EHLO penguin.e-mind.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 25 Feb 2001 14:24:46 -0500 Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 20:26:05 +0100 From: Andrea Arcangeli To: Jens Axboe Cc: Linus Torvalds , Marcelo Tosatti , lkml Subject: Re: ll_rw_block/submit_bh and request limits Message-ID: <20010225202605.C16259@athlon.random> In-Reply-To: <20010222145642.D17276@suse.de> <20010222223811.A29372@athlon.random> <20010225183401.D7830@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20010225183401.D7830@suse.de>; from axboe@suse.de on Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 06:34:01PM +0100 X-GnuPG-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.gnupg.asc X-PGP-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.asc Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 06:34:01PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote: > Any reason why you don't have a lower wake-up limit for the queue? The watermark diff looked too high (it's 128M in current Linus's tree), but it's probably a good idea to resurrect it with a max difference of a few full sized requests (1/2mbytes). > Do you mind if I do some testing with this patch and fold it in, > possibly? Go ahead, thanks, Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/