Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S936507AbcKNTYC (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Nov 2016 14:24:02 -0500 Received: from mail-pf0-f170.google.com ([209.85.192.170]:33548 "EHLO mail-pf0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932343AbcKNTX7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Nov 2016 14:23:59 -0500 From: Kevin Hilman To: Neil Armstrong , Martin Blumenstingl Cc: carlo@caione.org, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ARM64: dts: Add support for Meson GXM Organization: BayLibre References: <20161114094411.30199-1-narmstrong@baylibre.com> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 11:17:19 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20161114094411.30199-1-narmstrong@baylibre.com> (Neil Armstrong's message of "Mon, 14 Nov 2016 10:44:11 +0100") Message-ID: <7hlgwl6fcw.fsf@baylibre.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 619 Lines: 17 Neil Armstrong writes: > Following the Amlogic Linux kernel, it seem the only differences > between the GXL and GXM SoCs are the CPU Clusters. > > Simply add a meson-gxm dtsi and reproduce the P23x to Q20x boards > dts files since the S905D and S912 SoCs shares the same pinout > and the P23x and Q20x boards are identical. Since the P23x and Q20x boards are identical, should we just come up with a singel dtsi for them all? e.g move the -p23x.dtsi to -pq2xx.dtsi or something? I don't think it's a big deal, but it does seem like we should avoid the copy/paste wherever possible. Kevin