Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:25:14 -0800
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, peterhuewe@gmx.de,
        tpmdd@selhorst.net, jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/9] tpm: cleanup/fixes in existing event log support
Message-ID: <20161115002514.qhweuyzg5mgebusq@intel.com>
References: <1479117656-12403-1-git-send-email-nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <20161114223322.5uzdc7sob2vukwrq@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20161114223322.5uzdc7sob2vukwrq@intel.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.2-neo (2016-08-21)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 998
Lines: 22

On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 02:33:23PM -0800, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 05:00:47AM -0500, Nayna Jain wrote:
> > This patch set includes the cleanup and bug fixes patches, previously
> > part of the "tpm: add the securityfs pseudo files support for TPM 2.0
> > firmware event log" patch set, in order to upstream them more quickly.
> 
> I applied the patches. I'm not yet sure whether these are part of the
> 4.10 pull request or whether I postpone to 4.11 (my preference would be
> 4.10 but I do not want to close that right now). I'll do testing next
> week before doing pull request.
> 
> I hope that the commits gets some reviews and testing now that they are
> easily testable in my master branch.

Event log still works and they do not seem to break TPM 2.0 (tried both
machine with tpm_crb and tpm_tis).

Stefan: would you mind check that these do not break your TPM 1.2
environment? I already tried wih TPM 1.2 machine but probably would
make sense to peer test.

/Jarkko