Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755500AbcKOHF7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Nov 2016 02:05:59 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:47999 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755348AbcKOHF5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Nov 2016 02:05:57 -0500 From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" To: Reza Arbab , Michael Ellerman , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Andrew Morton , Rob Herring , Frank Rowand , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Bharata B Rao , Nathan Fontenot , Stewart Smith , Alistair Popple , Balbir Singh , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/5] mm: remove x86-only restriction of movable_node In-Reply-To: <1479160961-25840-3-git-send-email-arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1479160961-25840-1-git-send-email-arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1479160961-25840-3-git-send-email-arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 12:35:42 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 16111507-0040-0000-0000-000001DCEFB2 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00006080; HX=3.00000240; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000189; SDB=6.00780876; UDB=6.00376606; IPR=6.00558383; BA=6.00004881; NDR=6.00000001; ZLA=6.00000005; ZF=6.00000009; ZB=6.00000000; ZP=6.00000000; ZH=6.00000000; ZU=6.00000002; MB=3.00013329; XFM=3.00000011; UTC=2016-11-15 07:05:53 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 16111507-0041-0000-0000-000005CFF57C Message-Id: <87lgwlb4u1.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2016-11-15_03:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=1 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1609300000 definitions=main-1611150128 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1348 Lines: 36 Reza Arbab writes: > In commit c5320926e370 ("mem-hotplug: introduce movable_node boot > option"), the memblock allocation direction is changed to bottom-up and > then back to top-down like this: > > 1. memblock_set_bottom_up(true), called by cmdline_parse_movable_node(). > 2. memblock_set_bottom_up(false), called by x86's numa_init(). > > Even though (1) occurs in generic mm code, it is wrapped by #ifdef > CONFIG_MOVABLE_NODE, which depends on X86_64. > > This means that when we extend CONFIG_MOVABLE_NODE to non-x86 arches, > things will be unbalanced. (1) will happen for them, but (2) will not. > > This toggle was added in the first place because x86 has a delay between > adding memblocks and marking them as hotpluggable. Since other arches do > this marking either immediately or not at all, they do not require the > bottom-up toggle. > > So, resolve things by moving (1) from cmdline_parse_movable_node() to > x86's setup_arch(), immediately after the movable_node parameter has > been parsed. Considering that we now can mark memblock hotpluggable, do we need to enable the bottom up allocation for ppc64 also ? > > Signed-off-by: Reza Arbab > --- > Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 2 +- > arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ -aneesh