Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261252AbTEHJrT (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 May 2003 05:47:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261254AbTEHJrS (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 May 2003 05:47:18 -0400 Received: from nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com ([66.187.233.200]:47377 "EHLO devserv.devel.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261252AbTEHJrN (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 May 2003 05:47:13 -0400 Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 09:59:43 +0000 From: Arjan van de Ven To: Terje Eggestad Cc: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com>, "arjanv@redhat.com" , Steffen Persvold , linux-kernel Subject: Re: The disappearing sys_call_table export. Message-ID: <20030508095943.B22255@devserv.devel.redhat.com> References: <200305071507_MC3-1-37CF-FE32@compuserve.com> <1052387912.4849.43.camel@pc-16.office.scali.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <1052387912.4849.43.camel@pc-16.office.scali.no>; from terje.eggestad@scali.com on Thu, May 08, 2003 at 11:58:33AM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 761 Lines: 22 On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 11:58:33AM +0200, Terje Eggestad wrote: > I guess something like this: > > typedef int (*syscall_hook_t)(void * arg1, void * arg2, void * arg3, > void * arg4, void * arg5, void * arg6); > > #define HOOK_IN_FLAG 0x1 > #define HOOK_OUT_FLAG 0x2 > > opaquehandle = int register_syscall_hook(int syscall_nr, syscall_hook_t > hook_function, int flags); > int unregister(int opaquehandle); > > I'd make a stab at it if I knew that it stood a chance of getting > accepted. I dont think it has. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/