Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933475AbcKOMPD (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Nov 2016 07:15:03 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:57324 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932396AbcKOMO7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Nov 2016 07:14:59 -0500 Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 13:14:56 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Joerg Roedel Cc: Tom Lendacky , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Rik van Riel , Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= , Arnd Bergmann , Jonathan Corbet , Matt Fleming , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Paolo Bonzini , Larry Woodman , Ingo Molnar , Andy Lutomirski , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrey Ryabinin , Alexander Potapenko , Thomas Gleixner , Dmitry Vyukov Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 04/20] x86: Handle reduction in physical address size with SME Message-ID: <20161115121456.f4slpk4i2jl3e2ke@pd.tnic> References: <20161110003426.3280.2999.stgit@tlendack-t1.amdoffice.net> <20161110003513.3280.12104.stgit@tlendack-t1.amdoffice.net> <20161115121035.GD24857@8bytes.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161115121035.GD24857@8bytes.org> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20161014 (1.7.1) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 493 Lines: 14 On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 01:10:35PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote: > Maybe add a comment here why you can't use cpu_has (yet). So that could be alleviated by moving this function *after* init_scattered_cpuid_features(). Then you can simply do *cpu_has(). Also, I'm not sure why we're checking CPUID for the SME feature when we have sme_get_me_mask() et al which have been setup much earlier... -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.