Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 14:07:51 +0000
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: "open list:AMD IOMMU (AMD-VI)" <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>, Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>,
        Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>, Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
        Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>,
        Nate Watterson <nwatters@codeaurora.org>,
        Prem Mallappa <prem.mallappa@broadcom.com>,
        Dennis Chen <dennis.chen@arm.com>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/16] ACPI IORT ARM SMMU support
Message-ID: <20161115140751.GA16710@red-moon>
References: <20161109141948.19244-1-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
 <CAJZ5v0j09fsp4Y66v2UANOGnW4FNO7PWxpZY=Pgw=bUccEL_eA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20161115101257.GB16261@red-moon>
 <CAJZ5v0gh9qB41zcnvnETDA-5ho577uhxE4rehZqEXorFViY__w@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0gh9qB41zcnvnETDA-5ho577uhxE4rehZqEXorFViY__w@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1156
Lines: 31

On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 02:04:09PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi
> <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> wrote:
> > Hi Rafael,
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 12:36:12AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> Hi Lorenzo,
> >>
> >> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi
> >> <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> wrote:
> >> > This patch series is v7 of a previous posting:
> >> >
> >> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/10/18/506
> >>
> >> I don't see anything objectionable in this series.
> >>
> >> Please let me know which patches in particular to look at in detail.
> >
> > Are patches 7 and consequently 16 (that builds on top of 7) ok with
> > you ? They should be equivalent to nop on anything other than ARM64
> > but they touch ACPI core so they require an ACK if they are ok please.
> 
> Yes, they are.  Please feel free to add my ACKs to those or I will
> send them separately later today.

Thank you very much, I will add them to v8 that should be final,
I will send it when the dust has settled on patch 4, which looks
like the last bit to sort out (we may not even need a v8 at all).

Thanks !
Lorenzo