Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261489AbTEHN5R (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 May 2003 09:57:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261497AbTEHN5R (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 May 2003 09:57:17 -0400 Received: from siaag2aa.compuserve.com ([149.174.40.131]:13215 "EHLO siaag2aa.compuserve.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261489AbTEHN5R (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 May 2003 09:57:17 -0400 Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 10:08:36 -0400 From: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com> Subject: Re: top stack (l)users for 2.5.69 To: Jvrn Engel Cc: linux-kernel Message-ID: <200305081009_MC3-1-37FA-2407@compuserve.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1134 Lines: 22 > I have no idea, what a 'typical processor' might look like. But the > thing most CPU seem to have in common is that they save two registers > either on the stack or into other registers that only exist for this > purpose (SRR on PPC). > > Once that has happened, the OS has the job to figure out where it's > stack (or equivalent) is located, *without* clobbering the registers. > Once that is done, it can save all the registern on the stack, > including SRR. On i386 the CPU automatically switches to the stack corresponding to the privilege level (PL) of the interrupt handler, then pushes the instruction pointer and flags onto that stack. It is theoretically possible to write unprivileged interrupt handlers by using conforming code segments, in which case a stack switch will not occur, but such a handler cannot touch anything but registers and stack so it's not very useful. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/