Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752547AbcKPHwn (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2016 02:52:43 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f67.google.com ([74.125.82.67]:34820 "EHLO mail-wm0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751633AbcKPHwm (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2016 02:52:42 -0500 Message-ID: <582C1041.7040809@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 07:52:33 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marek Vasut , Boris Brezillon , Richard Weinberger , David Woodhouse , Brian Norris , Cyrille Pitchen CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: nand: nandsim: fix error check References: <1479251395-3100-1-git-send-email-sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> <0ad0b3d4-bde6-57ab-6856-de771ade3c32@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <0ad0b3d4-bde6-57ab-6856-de771ade3c32@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1101 Lines: 30 On Tuesday 15 November 2016 11:42 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 11/16/2016 12:09 AM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: >> debugfs_create_dir() and debugfs_create_file() returns NULL on error or >> a pointer on success. They do not return the error value with ERR_PTR. >> So we should not check the return with IS_ERR_OR_NULL, instead we >> should just check for NULL. >> >> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee >> --- >> drivers/mtd/nand/nandsim.c | 9 +++------ >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nandsim.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nandsim.c >> index c76287a..9b0d79a 100644 >> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nandsim.c >> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nandsim.c >> @@ -525,15 +525,13 @@ static int nandsim_debugfs_create(struct nandsim *dev) >> { >> struct nandsim_debug_info *dbg = &dev->dbg; >> struct dentry *dent; >> - int err; >> + int err = -ENODEV; > > Why don't you just nuke the err altogether and just return -ENODEV ? That was the first version which i made and discarded before sending. I will go and find it now. Regards Sudip