Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932951AbcKPIKO (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2016 03:10:14 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([141.255.128.1]:39257 "EHLO hera.aquilenet.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751754AbcKPIKJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2016 03:10:09 -0500 Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 09:10:04 +0100 From: Samuel Thibault To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" , Jiri Slaby , Dmitry Torokhov , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] vt: fix Scroll Lock LED trigger name Message-ID: <20161116081004.GT2448@var.home> Mail-Followup-To: Samuel Thibault , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Maciej S. Szmigiero" , Jiri Slaby , Dmitry Torokhov , linux-kernel References: <20161116072442.GA19957@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161116072442.GA19957@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 497 Lines: 15 Hello, Greg Kroah-Hartman, on Wed 16 Nov 2016 08:24:42 +0100, wrote: > > static struct kbd_led_trigger kbd_led_triggers[] = { > > - KBD_LED_TRIGGER(VC_SCROLLOCK, "kbd-scrollock"), > > + KBD_LED_TRIGGER(VC_SCROLLOCK, "kbd-scrolllock"), > > KBD_LED_TRIGGER(VC_NUMLOCK, "kbd-numlock"), > > KBD_LED_TRIGGER(VC_CAPSLOCK, "kbd-capslock"), > > KBD_LED_TRIGGER(VC_KANALOCK, "kbd-kanalock"), > > So, how far back should this change be backported to? This was introduced in Linux 4.2. Samuel