Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S936535AbcKPIPW (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2016 03:15:22 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:38494 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933299AbcKPIPU (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2016 03:15:20 -0500 Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 09:15:25 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Samuel Thibault , "Maciej S. Szmigiero" , Jiri Slaby , Dmitry Torokhov , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] vt: fix Scroll Lock LED trigger name Message-ID: <20161116081525.GA23604@kroah.com> References: <20161116072442.GA19957@kroah.com> <20161116081004.GT2448@var.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161116081004.GT2448@var.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 626 Lines: 18 On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 09:10:04AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hello, > > Greg Kroah-Hartman, on Wed 16 Nov 2016 08:24:42 +0100, wrote: > > > static struct kbd_led_trigger kbd_led_triggers[] = { > > > - KBD_LED_TRIGGER(VC_SCROLLOCK, "kbd-scrollock"), > > > + KBD_LED_TRIGGER(VC_SCROLLOCK, "kbd-scrolllock"), > > > KBD_LED_TRIGGER(VC_NUMLOCK, "kbd-numlock"), > > > KBD_LED_TRIGGER(VC_CAPSLOCK, "kbd-capslock"), > > > KBD_LED_TRIGGER(VC_KANALOCK, "kbd-kanalock"), > > > > So, how far back should this change be backported to? > > This was introduced in Linux 4.2. Great, thanks for letting me know. greg k-h