Message-Id: <200305081612.h48GCUW25789@mail.osdl.org>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 09:12:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: markw@osdl.org
Subject: Re: OSDL DBT-2 AS vs. Deadline 2.5.68-mm2
To: piggin@cyberone.com.au
cc: akpm@digeo.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <3EB9B5BA.4080607@cyberone.com.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 861
Lines: 24

On  8 May, Nick Piggin wrote:
> markw@osdl.org wrote:
> 
>>I've collected some data from STP to see if it's useful or if there's
>>anything else that would be useful to collect. I've got some tests
>>queued up for the newer patches, but I wanted to put out what I had so
>>far.
>>
> Thanks. It looks like AS isn't doing too badly here. Newer mm kernels
> have some more AS changes, and the dynamic struct request patch which
> would be good to test.
> 
> Are you using TCQ on your disks?
> 

There's a queue depth being set.  Is that a good indicator that TCQ is
being used?  If not, I'd be happy to verify it.

Mark
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/