Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S941455AbcKQLqS (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Nov 2016 06:46:18 -0500 Received: from mail-yb0-f196.google.com ([209.85.213.196]:35903 "EHLO mail-yb0-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932271AbcKQLqN (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Nov 2016 06:46:13 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161117113302.GU28558@mwanda> References: <1479361348-7348-1-git-send-email-sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com> <1479361348-7348-2-git-send-email-sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com> <20161117104941.GA6266@mwanda> <20161117113302.GU28558@mwanda> From: Sergio Paracuellos Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 12:46:12 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] staging: slicoss: fix different address space warnings: 32 bits To: Dan Carpenter Cc: Greg KH , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel , Lior Dotan Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 360 Lines: 12 On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote: > Give it a shot and see if the warnings go away. I don't think the tag > is correct. Just removing __iomem tag in shmem_data field of slic_shmemory struct makes sparse happy. No warnings around. Should I send a v4 patch with the tag removed? Cheers, Sergio Paracuellos