Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753514AbcKQMCr (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Nov 2016 07:02:47 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:35708 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751640AbcKQMCp (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Nov 2016 07:02:45 -0500 Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 13:02:57 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Sven Eckelmann Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Linus =?iso-8859-1?Q?L=FCssing?= , Simon Wunderlich Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.8 78/92] batman-adv: fix splat on disabling an interface Message-ID: <20161117120257.GB22450@kroah.com> References: <20161117103224.218007793@linuxfoundation.org> <20161117103227.709330459@linuxfoundation.org> <8968438.8jDTpzOKUM@bentobox> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <8968438.8jDTpzOKUM@bentobox> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1212 Lines: 34 On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 11:51:24AM +0100, Sven Eckelmann wrote: > On Donnerstag, 17. November 2016 11:32:51 CET Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > 4.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > > > ------------------ > > > > From: Linus L?ssing > > > > commit 9799c50372b23ed774791bdb87d700f1286ee8a9 upstream. > > > > As long as there is still a reference for a hard interface held, there might > > still be a forwarding packet relying on its attributes. > > > > Therefore avoid setting hard_iface->soft_iface to NULL when disabling a hard > > interface. > > > > This fixes the following, potential splat: > > > [...] > > Thanks for your backporting efforts. There is already a revert for this patch > queued up in batadv/net [1] (targets net.git). So maybe you want to drop this > patch from your stable queue. > > We also got test results from Linus which showed that this problem didn't > happen anymore with recent kernel versions (without his patch). These results > made him also Ack the revert. > > Sorry about this confusing situation. Not a problem, I've dropped this one from the patch queue now, thanks for letting me know. greg k-h