Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752563AbcKRAS6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Nov 2016 19:18:58 -0500 Received: from ec2-52-27-115-49.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com ([52.27.115.49]:53048 "EHLO osg.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751243AbcKRASy (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Nov 2016 19:18:54 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/6] enable O and KBUILD_OUTPUT for kselftest To: Michael Ellerman , bamvor.zhangjian@huawei.com, Shuah Khan References: <1477047694-24122-1-git-send-email-bamvor.zhangjian@huawei.com> <56f64f51-f1f6-80a3-1aa2-11801e798555@osg.samsung.com> <8760nliqxj.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> Cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, khilman@linaro.org, broonie@kernel.org, Shuah Khan From: Shuah Khan Message-ID: Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 17:18:23 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8760nliqxj.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1287 Lines: 44 On 11/17/2016 05:15 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Shuah Khan writes: > >> On 10/21/2016 05:01 AM, bamvor.zhangjian@huawei.com wrote: >>> From: Bamvor Jian Zhang >>> >>> Here is my first version for enabling the KBUILD_OUTPUT for kselftest. >>> I fix and test all the TARGET in tools/testing/selftest/Makefile. For >>> ppc, I test through fake target. > ... >>> >>> The last patch introduces the KBUILD_OUTPUT and O for kselftest instead >>> using the existing kbuild system because user may compile kselftest >>> directly (make -C tools/testing/selftests). >> >> I am planning to get this into 4.10. >> >> Michael! >> >> Are okay with me taking powerpc tests through kselftest tree? >> If so could you please give me Ack. > > I already have quite a lot of selftests queued for 4.10, so this will > conflict badly with those I suspect. Let me know how bad it is, maybe we can wait on these until 4.11 > > If you put this series in a topic branch that we can both merge then > that will probably be OK. Once you are done with reviews, we can make a call on whether to merge them now or later. > > I'd like to review the series first too, will try and get that done > today. > > cheers > Okay sounds good. thanks, -- Shuah