Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752291AbcKRDXB (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Nov 2016 22:23:01 -0500 Received: from mail-it0-f52.google.com ([209.85.214.52]:37981 "EHLO mail-it0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751556AbcKRDW7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Nov 2016 22:22:59 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1479361006.13083.7.camel@mtksdaap41> References: <1479266454-31892-1-git-send-email-jitao.shi@mediatek.com> <1479361006.13083.7.camel@mtksdaap41> From: Daniel Kurtz Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 11:22:37 +0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: GwkWbd5oF-WxDqL8A82o7YFJF20 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] drm/mediatek: fixed the calc method of data rate per lane To: CK Hu Cc: Jitao Shi , Philipp Zabel , Matthias Brugger , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Ajay Kumar , Inki Dae , Rahul Sharma , Sean Paul , Vincent Palatin , Andy Yan , Russell King , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND..." , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , dri-devel , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" , srv_heupstream , Sascha Hauer , =?UTF-8?B?WWluZ2pvZSBDaGVuICjpmbPoi7HmtLIp?= , =?UTF-8?B?RWRkaWUgSHVhbmcgKOm7g+aZuuWCkSk=?= , cawa cheng , =?UTF-8?B?QmliYnkgSHNpZWggKOisnea/n+mBoCk=?= , stonea168@163.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1553 Lines: 53 Hi CK, On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 1:36 PM, CK Hu wrote: > Hi, Jitao: > > > On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 11:20 +0800, Jitao Shi wrote: >> Tune dsi frame rate by pixel clock, dsi add some extra signal (i.e. >> Tlpx, Ths-prepare, Ths-zero, Ths-trail,Ths-exit) when enter and exit LP >> mode, those signals will cause h-time larger than normal and reduce FPS. >> So need to multiply a coefficient to offset the extra signal's effect. >> coefficient = ((htotal*bpp/lane_number)+Tlpx+Ths_prep+Ths_zero+ >> Ths_trail+Ths_exit)/(htotal*bpp/lane_number) >> >> Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi > > It looks good to me. > But this patch conflict with [1] which is one patch of MT2701 series. I > want to apply MT2701 patches first, so please help to refine this patch > based on MT2701 patches. I don't think the MT2701 DSI patches are quite ready yet (I just reviewed the one below). Can we instead land Jitao's small targeted change first, and then rebase the MT2701 series on top. Thanks, -Dan > > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9422821/ > > Regards, > CK > >> --- >> Change since v4: >> - tune the calc comment more clear. >> - define the phy timings as constants. >> >> Chnage since v3: >> - wrapp the commit msg. >> - fix alignment of some lines. >> >> Change since v2: >> - move phy timing back to dsi_phy_timconfig. >> >> Change since v1: >> - phy_timing2 and phy_timing3 refer clock cycle time. >> - define values of LPX HS_PRPR HS_ZERO HS_TRAIL TA_GO TA_SURE TA_GET DA_HS_EXIT. >> --- >> >