Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754170AbcKRT5r (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Nov 2016 14:57:47 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:58148 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751965AbcKRT5m (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Nov 2016 14:57:42 -0500 Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 19:56:57 +0000 From: Mark Rutland To: fu.wei@linaro.org Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, tglx@linutronix.de, marc.zyngier@arm.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, sudeep.holla@arm.com, hanjun.guo@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, rruigrok@codeaurora.org, harba@codeaurora.org, cov@codeaurora.org, timur@codeaurora.org, graeme.gregory@linaro.org, al.stone@linaro.org, jcm@redhat.com, wei@redhat.com, arnd@arndb.de, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com, leo.duran@amd.com, wim@iguana.be, linux@roeck-us.net, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, tn@semihalf.com, christoffer.dall@linaro.org, julien.grall@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 08/15] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: Refactor arch_timer_needs_probing, and call it only if acpi disabled. Message-ID: <20161118195657.GM1197@leverpostej> References: <1479304148-2965-1-git-send-email-fu.wei@linaro.org> <1479304148-2965-9-git-send-email-fu.wei@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1479304148-2965-9-git-send-email-fu.wei@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2747 Lines: 82 On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 09:49:01PM +0800, fu.wei@linaro.org wrote: > From: Fu Wei > > The patch refactor original arch_timer_needs_probing function: > (1) Separate out arch_timer_needs_probing from arch_timer_common_init, > and call it only if acpi disabled. > (2) Rename arch_timer_needs_probing to arch_timer_needs_of_probing. Please write a real commit message. > Signed-off-by: Fu Wei > --- > drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++--------------- > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c > index fe4e812..9ddc091 100644 > --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c > +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c > @@ -792,15 +792,28 @@ static const struct of_device_id arch_timer_mem_of_match[] __initconst = { > {}, > }; > > -static bool __init > -arch_timer_needs_probing(int type, const struct of_device_id *matches) > +static bool __init arch_timer_needs_of_probing(void) > { > struct device_node *dn; > bool needs_probing = false; > + unsigned int mask = ARCH_TIMER_TYPE_CP15 | ARCH_TIMER_TYPE_MEM; > + > + /* We have two timers, and both device-tree nodes are probed. */ > + if ((arch_timers_present & mask) == mask) > + return false; > + > + /* > + * Only one type of timer is probed, > + * check if we have another type of timer node in device-tree. > + */ > + if (arch_timers_present & ARCH_TIMER_TYPE_CP15) > + dn = of_find_matching_node(NULL, arch_timer_mem_of_match); > + else > + dn = of_find_matching_node(NULL, arch_timer_of_match); > > - dn = of_find_matching_node(NULL, matches); > - if (dn && of_device_is_available(dn) && !(arch_timers_present & type)) > + if (dn && of_device_is_available(dn)) > needs_probing = true; > + > of_node_put(dn); > > return needs_probing; > @@ -808,17 +821,8 @@ arch_timer_needs_probing(int type, const struct of_device_id *matches) > > static int __init arch_timer_common_init(void) > { > - unsigned int mask = ARCH_TIMER_TYPE_CP15 | ARCH_TIMER_TYPE_MEM; > - > - /* Wait until both nodes are probed if we have two timers */ > - if ((arch_timers_present & mask) != mask) { > - if (arch_timer_needs_probing(ARCH_TIMER_TYPE_MEM, > - arch_timer_mem_of_match)) > - return 0; > - if (arch_timer_needs_probing(ARCH_TIMER_TYPE_CP15, > - arch_timer_of_match)) > - return 0; > - } Why can't we just move this into the DT-specific caller of arch_timer_common_init()? Thanks Mark. > + if (acpi_disabled && arch_timer_needs_of_probing()) > + return 0; > > arch_timer_banner(arch_timers_present); > arch_counter_register(arch_timers_present); > -- > 2.7.4 >