Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753309AbcKSSgj (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Nov 2016 13:36:39 -0500 Received: from quartz.orcorp.ca ([184.70.90.242]:56110 "EHLO quartz.orcorp.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753246AbcKSSgi (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Nov 2016 13:36:38 -0500 Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2016 11:36:27 -0700 From: Jason Gunthorpe To: Jarkko Sakkinen Cc: Nayna , tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, peterhuewe@gmx.de, tpmdd@selhorst.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/9] tpm: cleanup/fixes in existing event log support Message-ID: <20161119183627.GC22775@obsidianresearch.com> References: <1479117656-12403-1-git-send-email-nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20161114223322.5uzdc7sob2vukwrq@intel.com> <20161115002514.qhweuyzg5mgebusq@intel.com> <20161115021543.d4wgjqid7fut4y4c@intel.com> <582A9EAE.5000505@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20161115174012.3pfxzz2ugrdglj4o@intel.com> <20161115180610.GA1852@obsidianresearch.com> <20161115185453.e52miq2em7gj4qyi@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161115185453.e52miq2em7gj4qyi@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 867 Lines: 19 On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:54:53AM -0800, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:06:10AM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 09:40:12AM -0800, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > > > I applied fix from Colin. I for OF specific patches in this patch set > > > I do not have means to test the code paths that exercise OF specific > > > functionality. This is what worries me a bit. If I had tested-by from > > > someone running a system that can exercise those code paths, I would > > > be less worried. > > > > I can probably check it next week on my OF systems that do not use event log > > Thanks Jason. I'll apppend your Tested-by's to the commits when you're > done. Probably doing pull request in the latter part of next week. What are we testing? Your master now? It will need the patch I just sent or it will fail for me. Jason