Message-ID: <5832C005.3070104@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 15:06:05 +0530
From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>, <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        <robh+dt@kernel.org>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>, <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
        <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
CC: <gnurou@gmail.com>, <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
        <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] pinctrl: tegra: Add driver to configure voltage
 and power of io pads
References: <1478696782-11657-1-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> <1478696782-11657-3-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> <b65cf9ea-208a-0704-7cc9-843bc18da508@nvidia.com>
In-Reply-To: <b65cf9ea-208a-0704-7cc9-843bc18da508@nvidia.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1730
Lines: 52


Hi Jon,
I will update the patch per your comment.
Here is answer for some of the query.

Thanks,
Laxman


On Tuesday 15 November 2016 08:37 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
> On 09/11/16 13:06, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>> +/**
>> + * Macro for 1.8V, keep 200mV as tolerance for deciding that
>> + * IO pads should be set for 3.3V (high voltage) or 1.8V.
>> + */
>> +#define TEGRA_IO_PAD_1800000UV_UPPER_LIMIT 2000000
> Is there a reference we could add for the source of this information?

I had a discussion with the ASIC on this and as per them
     1.8 V nominal is (1.62V, 1.98V)
     3.3 V nominal is (2.97V,3.63V)

I am working with them to update the TRM document but we can assume that 
this information will be there in TRM.

>> +	const struct pinctrl_pin_desc *pins_desc;
>> +	int num_pins_desc;
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct tegra_io_pads_regulator_info {
>> +	struct device *dev;
>> +	const struct tegra_io_pads_cfg_info *pads_cfg;
>> +	struct regulator *regulator;
>> +	struct notifier_block regulator_nb;
>> +};
> Is this struct necessary? Seems to be a lot of duplicated information
> from the other structs. Why not add the regulator and regulator_nb to
> the main struct? OK, not all io_pads have a regulator but you are only
> saving one pointer.
Yes, some of IO pads support multi-voltage.


>
> +		if ((vdata->old_uV > TEGRA_IO_PAD_1800000UV_UPPER_LIMIT) &&
> +		    (vdata->min_uV <= TEGRA_IO_PAD_1800000UV_UPPER_LIMIT))
> +			break;
> The data-sheet for Tegra210 only lists 1.8V or 3.3V as supported
> options. Do we need to support a range? Or does the h/w support a range
> of voltages? I am just wondering why we cannot check explicitly for 1.8V
> or 3.3V and treat anything else as an error.

Two voltage level, not range.