Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755165AbcKVD7X (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2016 22:59:23 -0500 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:49257 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754614AbcKVD7V (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2016 22:59:21 -0500 Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 14:59:17 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Matias =?UTF-8?B?QmrDuHJsaW5n?= Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the lightnvm tree with Linus' tree Message-ID: <20161122145917.4f1d0e86@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 752 Lines: 26 Hi Matias, Today's linux-next merge of the lightnvm tree got a conflict in: drivers/nvme/host/lightnvm.c between commit: 409ae5a76e05 ("lightnvm: invalid offset calculation for lba_shift") from Linus' tree and commit: 2db3cb58a3dd ("nvme: lightnvm: attach lightnvm sysfs to nvme block device") from the lightnvm tree. I fixed it up (I just used the latter version) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell