Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261890AbTEJDWx (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 May 2003 23:22:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263637AbTEJDWx (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 May 2003 23:22:53 -0400 Received: from nessie.weebeastie.net ([61.8.7.205]:43146 "EHLO nessie.weebeastie.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261890AbTEJDWw (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 May 2003 23:22:52 -0400 Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 13:35:04 +1000 From: CaT To: Andi Kleen Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use correct x86 reboot vector Message-ID: <20030510033504.GA1789@zip.com.au> References: <20030510025634.GA31713@averell> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030510025634.GA31713@averell> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Organisation: Furball Inc. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1091 Lines: 22 On Sat, May 10, 2003 at 04:56:34AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > Extensive discussion by various experts on the discuss@x86-64.org > mailing list concluded that the correct vector to restart an 286+ > CPU is f000:fff0, not ffff:0000. Both seem to work on current systems, > but the first is correct. Could this bug, by any chance, cause a system to shutdown instead of rebooting? This is what happens to me at the moment but not each and every time. -- Martin's distress was in contrast to the bitter satisfaction of some of his fellow marines as they surveyed the scene. "The Iraqis are sick people and we are the chemotherapy," said Corporal Ryan Dupre. "I am starting to hate this country. Wait till I get hold of a friggin' Iraqi. No, I won't get hold of one. I'll just kill him." - http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article2479.htm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/