Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756071AbcKVQrV (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Nov 2016 11:47:21 -0500 Received: from magic.merlins.org ([209.81.13.136]:49717 "EHLO mail1.merlins.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751487AbcKVQrT (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Nov 2016 11:47:19 -0500 Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 08:47:11 -0800 From: Marc MERLIN To: Michal Hocko Cc: Vlastimil Babka , linux-mm@kvack.org, Linus Torvalds , LKML , Joonsoo Kim , Tejun Heo , Greg Kroah-Hartman Message-ID: <20161122164711.5cpdl4ukr7rry4nf@merlins.org> References: <20161121154336.GD19750@merlins.org> <0d4939f3-869d-6fb8-0914-5f74172f8519@suse.cz> <20161121215639.GF13371@merlins.org> <20161122160629.uzt2u6m75ash4ved@merlins.org> <48061a22-0203-de54-5a44-89773bff1e63@suse.cz> <20161122162544.GG6831@dhcp22.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161122162544.GG6831@dhcp22.suse.cz> X-Sysadmin: BOFH X-URL: http://marc.merlins.org/ User-Agent: NeoMutt/20160916 (1.7.0) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 173.11.111.145 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: marc@merlins.org X-Spam-Report: * -2.9 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -1.5 GREYLIST_ISWHITE The incoming server has been whitelisted for this * receipient and sender Subject: Re: 4.8.8 kernel trigger OOM killer repeatedly when I have lots of RAM that should be free Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1460 Lines: 30 On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 05:25:44PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > currently AFAIR. I hate that Marc is not falling into that category but > is it really problem for you to run with 4.9? If we have more users Don't do anything just on my account. I had a problem, it's been fixed in 2 different ways: 4.8+patch, or 4.9rc5 For me this was a 100% regression from 4.6, there was just no way I could copy my data at all with 4.8, it not only failed, but killed all the services on my machine until it randomly killed the shell that was doing the copy. Personally, I'll stick with 4.8 + this patch, and switch to 4.9 when it's out (I'm a bit wary of RC kernels on a production server, especially when I'm in the middle of trying to get my only good backup to work again) But at the same time, what I'm doing is probably not common (btrfs on top of dmcrypt, on top of bcache, on top of swraid5, for both source and destination), so I can't comment on whether the fix I just put on my 4.8 kernel does not cause other regressions or problems for other people. Either way, I'm personally ok again now, so I thank you all for your help, and will leave the hard decisions to you :) Marc -- "A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R. Microsoft is to operating systems .... .... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/ | PGP 1024R/763BE901