Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932721AbcKWGcS (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Nov 2016 01:32:18 -0500 Received: from www262.sakura.ne.jp ([202.181.97.72]:14366 "EHLO www262.sakura.ne.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932417AbcKWGcR (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Nov 2016 01:32:17 -0500 To: john.johansen@canonical.com, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] CaitSith LSM module From: Tetsuo Handa References: <1477054150-4772-1-git-send-email-penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> <3232ef1d-b378-a8a2-f113-03b2db4cc332@canonical.com> <201610252026.HCH52140.FOtVFOJLQMSOHF@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: <201610252026.HCH52140.FOtVFOJLQMSOHF@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Message-Id: <201611231531.DGH52135.QtFVOFJLOHFOSM@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> X-Mailer: Winbiff [Version 2.51 PL2] X-Accept-Language: ja,en,zh Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 15:31:20 +0900 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 773 Lines: 18 Tetsuo Handa wrote: > John Johansen wrote: > > > In order to minimize the burden of reviewing, this patchset implements > > > only functionality of checking program execution requests (i.e. execve() > > > system call) using pathnames. I'm planning to add other functionalities > > > after this version got included into mainline. You can find how future > > > versions of CaitSith will look like at http://caitsith.osdn.jp/ . > > > > > Thanks I've started working my way through this, but it is going to take > > me a while. > > > > Thank you for your time. May I hear the status? Is there something I can do other than waiting? I wrote a full manual for this patchset as http://caitsith.osdn.jp/index2.html . Does anybody have fundamental objection against CaitSith?