Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264462AbTEJR6U (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 May 2003 13:58:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264463AbTEJR6U (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 May 2003 13:58:20 -0400 Received: from mail.jlokier.co.uk ([81.29.64.88]:57728 "EHLO mail.jlokier.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264462AbTEJR6U (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 May 2003 13:58:20 -0400 Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 19:10:56 +0100 From: Jamie Lokier To: Jos Hulzink Cc: Andi Kleen , torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use correct x86 reboot vector Message-ID: <20030510181056.GB29682@mail.jlokier.co.uk> References: <20030510025634.GA31713@averell> <20030510161529.GB29271@mail.jlokier.co.uk> <200305102141.57860.josh@stack.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200305102141.57860.josh@stack.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 506 Lines: 13 Jos Hulzink wrote: > For the sake of bad behaving BIOSes however, I'd vote for the f000:fff0 > vector, unless someone can hand me a paper that says it is wrong. I agree, for the simple reason that it is what the chip does on a hardware reset signal. -- Jamie - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/