Message-ID: <87y409cw71.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
        Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
        Linux-DT <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux-ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v2] clkdev: add devm_of_clk_get()
In-Reply-To: <87a8cpejn5.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
References: <87wpl2yyuw.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
        <146785219147.73491.2827268663638530377@resonance>
        <87ziptixv7.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
        <20160707122636.GP1041@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>
        <8760shgfzu.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
        <146794140875.73491.7115209079607438738@resonance>
        <871t34hlin.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
        <878twndi54.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
        <8737isvwc6.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
        <20161123191037.GE25626@codeaurora.org>
        <87a8cpejn5.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 Emacs/24.3 Mule/6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 04:57:43 +0000
SpamDiagnosticOutput: 1:99
SpamDiagnosticMetadata: NSPM
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Nov 2016 04:57:43.7085 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HK2PR0601MB1444
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1258
Lines: 41


Hi Stephen, again

> > I've seen bindings that have the 'clocks' property at the top
> > level and the appropriate 'clock-names' property to relate the
> > clocks to a subnode.
> > 
> >  	sound_soc {
> > 		clocks = <&xxx>, <&xxx>;
> > 		clock-names = "cpu", "codec";
> >  		...
> >  		cpu {
> >  			...
> >  		};
> >  		codec {
> >  			...
> >  		};
> >  	};
> > 
> > Then the subnodes call clk_get() with the top level device and
> > the name of their node and things match up. I suppose this
> > binding is finalized though, so we can't really do that?
> > 
> > I see that the gpio framework has a similar design called
> > devm_get_gpiod_from_child(), so how about we add a
> > devm_get_clk_from_child() API? That would more closely match the
> > intent here, which is to restrict the clk_get() operation to
> > child nodes of the device passed as the first argument.
> > 
> > struct clk *devm_get_clk_from_child(struct device *dev,
> > 				    const char *con_id,
> > 				    struct device_node *child);

Thanks, but, my point is that Linux already have "of_clk_get()",
but we don't have its devm_ version.
The point is that of_clk_get() can get clock from "device_node".
Why having devm_ version become so problem ?

Best regards
---
Kuninori Morimoto