Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 14:04:03 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        vireshk@kernel.org, nm@ti.com, sboyd@codeaurora.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
        len.brown@intel.com, pavel@ucw.cz, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: fix CPU device to be removed from OPP table in
 wrong order
Message-ID: <20161124083403.GA29969@vireshk-i7>
References: <1479973761-21225-1-git-send-email-jy0922.shim@samsung.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1479973761-21225-1-git-send-email-jy0922.shim@samsung.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 622
Lines: 20

Ho Joonyoung,

On 24-11-16, 16:49, Joonyoung Shim wrote:
> The device that creates OPP table first should be removed from dev_list
> of OPP table in last because it can be used by other resources
> (supported_hw, prop_name, regulator), but not now.

I am not sure what you are trying to do here? Why can't the CPU which
added the OPP should be removed last.

Can you give a real example where you see a problem ?

> If OPP table is
> shared by several CPUs, the CPU device that creates OPP table can be
> removed earlier than other CPU devices.

I don't think that's a problem, though I can be wrong for sure.

-- 
viresh