Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264530AbTEJX74 (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 May 2003 19:59:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264531AbTEJX74 (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 May 2003 19:59:56 -0400 Received: from lakemtao03.cox.net ([68.1.17.242]:42191 "EHLO lakemtao03.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264530AbTEJX7z (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 May 2003 19:59:55 -0400 Message-ID: <3EBD9560.8060504@cox.net> Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 19:12:16 -0500 From: David van Hoose User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030225 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Ford CC: Norbert Wolff , Andy Pfiffer , lkml Subject: [RFC] devfs [was Re: ALSA busted in 2.5.69] References: <3EBBF00D.8040108@hotmail.com> <1052507530.15922.37.camel@andyp.pdx.osdl.net> <20030510080440.3446cc96.norbert_wolff@t-online.de> <3EBD8941.7070403@blue-labs.org> In-Reply-To: <3EBD8941.7070403@blue-labs.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 594 Lines: 18 David Ford wrote: > Shrug :) > > I use devfs, all is magic. All is [nearly always] correct. Are there any compatibility issues in 2.4 while using devfs under 2.5? I'm looking into it, but I'd like to hear that there are no problems before I jump into using it. I would love to hear comments from anyone using devfs. Good or bad. Thanks, David - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/