Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 23:10:57 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, peterhuewe@gmx.de,
        tpmdd@selhorst.net, jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com,
        linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] tpm: add securityfs support for TPM 2.0 firmware
 event log
Message-ID: <20161124211057.xynmfteky5r7uc27@intel.com>
References: <1479922057-8752-1-git-send-email-nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <1479922057-8752-4-git-send-email-nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1479922057-8752-4-git-send-email-nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.2-neo (2016-08-21)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 785
Lines: 18

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 12:27:37PM -0500, Nayna Jain wrote:
> Unlike the device driver support for TPM 1.2, the TPM 2.0 does
> not support the securityfs pseudo files for displaying the
> firmware event log.
> 
> This patch enables support for providing the TPM 2.0 event log in
> binary form. TPM 2.0 event log supports a crypto agile format that
> records multiple digests, which is different from TPM 1.2. This
> patch enables the tpm_bios_log_setup for TPM 2.0  and adds the
> event log parser which understand the TPM 2.0 crypto agile format.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

I don't want to say much about this before I've tested it. I wonder
what cheap hardware I could use to test this. Any advice is on this
from anyone is much appreciated.

/Jarkko