Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753259AbcKYJr6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Nov 2016 04:47:58 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:51440 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751872AbcKYJru (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Nov 2016 04:47:50 -0500 Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 10:46:38 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: "kernelci.org bot" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah.kh@samsung.com, patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/67] 4.8.11-stable review Message-ID: <20161125094638.GB20080@kroah.com> References: <20161124145457.061710350@linuxfoundation.org> <5837ca28.52301c0a.d82bc.07dd@mx.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5837ca28.52301c0a.d82bc.07dd@mx.google.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1488 Lines: 51 On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 09:20:40PM -0800, kernelci.org bot wrote: > stable-rc boot: 207 boots: 8 failed, 196 passed with 3 offline (v4.8.10-68-g5b1cb43a9ac7) > > Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/kernel/v4.8.10-68-g5b1cb43a9ac7/ > Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/kernel/v4.8.10-68-g5b1cb43a9ac7/ > > Tree: stable-rc > Branch: local/linux-4.8.y > Git Describe: v4.8.10-68-g5b1cb43a9ac7 > Git Commit: 5b1cb43a9ac7f608fdfc590c139aa66ead8d19ed > Git URL: http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > Tested: 57 unique boards, 18 SoC families, 30 builds out of 207 > > Boot Failures Detected: https://kernelci.org/boot/?v4.8.10-68-g5b1cb43a9ac7&fail > > arm: > > multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_SMP=n: > exynos5250-snow: 1 failed lab > > multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y: > at91-sama5d4_xplained: 1 failed lab > > exynos_defconfig: > exynos5250-arndale: 1 failed lab > > x86: > > defconfig+CONFIG_OF_UNITTEST=y: > x86-kvm: 1 failed lab > > defconfig+CONFIG_KASAN=y: > x86-kvm: 1 failed lab > > defconfig+CONFIG_LKDTM=y: > x86-kvm: 1 failed lab > > defconfig+kvm_guest: > x86-kvm: 1 failed lab > > x86_64_defconfig: > x86-kvm: 1 failed lab That's not good, is this a code problem, or a "lab" problem? The logs look like nothing is working for these, so is this a -rc problem? thanks, greg k-h