Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261315AbTEKM4Y (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 May 2003 08:56:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261323AbTEKM4Y (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 May 2003 08:56:24 -0400 Received: from modemcable204.207-203-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca ([24.203.207.204]:15232 "EHLO montezuma.mastecende.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261315AbTEKM4W (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 May 2003 08:56:22 -0400 Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 08:58:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Zwane Mwaikambo X-X-Sender: zwane@montezuma.mastecende.com To: William Lee Irwin III cc: Jos Hulzink , "Martin J. Bligh" , linux-kernel Subject: Re: irq balancing: performance disaster In-Reply-To: <20030511125438.GJ8978@holomorphy.com> Message-ID: References: <200305110118.10136.josh@stack.nl> <7750000.1052619248@[10.10.2.4]> <200305111200.31242.josh@stack.nl> <20030511125438.GJ8978@holomorphy.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 866 Lines: 22 On Sun, 11 May 2003, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > On Sun, May 11, 2003 at 08:17:53AM -0400, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote: > > It was a bug in 2.4, fixed in Alan's tree by setting target_cpus to 0xff > > (previously cpu_online_map). There is no noirqbalance option in 2.4 > > because there is no in kernel irq balancer. > > I vaguely like this notion because it removes a #ifdef and cleans up > a tiny bit of its surroundings. But it's not quite a one-liner. Nice, it's during init too so there really is no need for any sort of optimisation, the inline can also go and make it __init. Zwane -- function.linuxpower.ca - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/