Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753518AbcKYMAK (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Nov 2016 07:00:10 -0500 Received: from condef008-v.nifty.com ([210.131.4.245]:45761 "EHLO condef008-v.nifty.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753122AbcKYMAC (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Nov 2016 07:00:02 -0500 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conssluserg-01.nifty.com uAPBtVE4031043 X-Nifty-SrcIP: [209.85.161.181] MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161124021056.GJ6095@codeaurora.org> References: <1477503088-26508-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> <1477503088-26508-2-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> <20161124000503.GE6095@codeaurora.org> <20161124021056.GJ6095@codeaurora.org> From: Masahiro Yamada Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 20:55:30 +0900 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] clk: uniphier: add clock data for cpufreq To: Stephen Boyd Cc: linux-clk , Michael Turquette , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-arm-kernel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 447 Lines: 19 Hi Stephen, 2016-11-24 11:10 GMT+09:00 Stephen Boyd : >> If I drop 32bit SoC things, and send v2 only for 64bit SoCs, >> is that acceptable for 4.10-rc1? > > Sure. That sounds fine for now. I'll reply to your other thread > with a plan of attack on how to do the framework changes. I think > we need to do those regardless of the outcome of your > investigation. I posted v2 yesterday. -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada