Message-ID: <3EBE5E04.4020806@put.mielec.pl>
Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 16:28:20 +0200
From: Grzegorz Wilk <toulouse@put.mielec.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; PL; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl>
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SiS648 support for agpgart, kernel 2.4.21-rc2-ac1
References: <Pine.SOL.4.30.0305111531430.4788-100000@mion.elka.pw.edu.pl>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.4.30.0305111531430.4788-100000@mion.elka.pw.edu.pl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1058
Lines: 26

Uzytkownik Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz napisal:
> [...]
> It is a bit misleading, read once again and look at "GENERAL FEATURES",
> 2X and 4X supported and 8X *compatible*.
> Look also at R9200(PRO) spec, it is a R9000(PRO) with AGP3.0 support.

You're right. The information provided by ATI is confusing.
It dosen't make much differece to me. By the time
a game or application capable of taking any benefits from agp8x
will be released R9k will be too poor to work with it anyway... ;)

Still I have enough of companies mixing my mind with
such statements as ATI (I'm not really into hardware
so together with my poor english results in such mistakes).

> btw. R9100 is both faster/cheaper than R9000PRO.

I bought my R9k at the end of 2002 when it's power/economy indicator
used to be much higher than today is.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/