Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755851AbcKYTxK (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Nov 2016 14:53:10 -0500 Received: from smtp09.smtpout.orange.fr ([80.12.242.131]:58849 "EHLO smtp.smtpout.orange.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754821AbcKYTxD (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Nov 2016 14:53:03 -0500 X-ME-Helo: belgarion X-ME-Auth: amFyem1pay5yb2JlcnRAb3JhbmdlLmZy X-ME-Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 20:53:01 +0100 X-ME-IP: 109.222.248.90 From: Robert Jarzmik To: Stefan Schmidt Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Daniel Ribeiro , Stefan Schmidt , Harald Welte , Daniel Mack , Haojian Zhuang , Thierry Reding , "openezx-devel\@lists.openezx.org" , "linux-arm-kernel\@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: pxa: ezx: fix a910 camera data References: <20161124162955.3887066-1-arnd@arndb.de> X-URL: http://belgarath.falguerolles.org/ Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 20:53:00 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Schmidt's message of "Thu, 24 Nov 2016 23:10:09 +0100") Message-ID: <87eg1zqqub.fsf@belgarion.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1934 Lines: 48 Stefan Schmidt writes: > Hello. > > On 24.11.2016 17:29, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> The camera_supply_dummy_device definition is shared between a780 and a910, >> but only provided when the first is enabled and fails to build for a >> configuration with only a910: >> >> arch/arm/mach-pxa/ezx.c:1097:3: error: 'camera_supply_dummy_device' undeclared here (not in a function) >> >> This moves the definition into its own section. >> >> Fixes: 6c1b417adc8f ("ARM: pxa: ezx: use the new pxa_camera platform_data") >> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann >> --- >> arch/arm/mach-pxa/ezx.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- > > I wonder what we should do with ezx.c. > > As far as I know neither Daniel nor Harald or myself are doing anything > with this devices anymore. Besides a basic compile test having an ack or > reviewed by from our side is a bit worthless. :/ > > I should still have some of these phones around in a box somewhere. If > there is someone with a good motivation and time to take over on this > platform we will find a way to get the person this devices. > > Any takers? Robert? I guess you are already overloaded but you might > also have an interest. Worth asking :) Oh yes, I'm very interested in your box. Besides I really like old platforms :) > In the case nobody wants to pick up here what would you consider the > bets way forward? I could send a patch removing ezx platform support > from the kernel (basically ezx.c plus build support) or I can send a > patch marking it at least orphan in MAINTAINERS. Let me know what you think. > > Daniel, Harald, if one of you is still interested in these and what to > pick up the work again, please speak up now. :) Unless another maintainer steps in, you can submit a patch to transfer the maintainance onto me, and we'll see off mailing lists how we could arange the boards transfer. Cheers. -- Robert