Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753160AbcKYVwH (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Nov 2016 16:52:07 -0500 Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:22132 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751264AbcKYVwC (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Nov 2016 16:52:02 -0500 Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2016 00:51:39 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter To: Mike Marshall Cc: Martin Brandenburg , Christophe JAILLET , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] orangefs: Axe some dead code Message-ID: <20161125215139.GM6266@mwanda> References: <20161121221702.6438-1-christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Source-IP: userv0021.oracle.com [156.151.31.71] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 684 Lines: 17 On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 07:31:11AM -0500, Mike Marshall wrote: > This seems like a good and proper patch to me, and simple too. > But like all changes, it needs tested. While I was testing it, I > discovered a regression in the associated userspace code. I > "bisected" (we use SVN for the userspace part of Orangefs) > down to the commit that caused the regression, and some > of the userspace folks are going to fix it. > > I don't think I should ask Linus to pull this patch until I can > test it. Since we're about to go into rc7, it might not go in > until the next go around... > Linus is on 4.9-rc7 so you're saying this would probably go into 4.11? regards, dan carpenter