Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752933AbcK0RxV (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Sun, 27 Nov 2016 12:53:21 -0500
Received: from imap.thunk.org ([74.207.234.97]:37162 "EHLO imap.thunk.org"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1751532AbcK0RxU (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Sun, 27 Nov 2016 12:53:20 -0500
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2016 12:52:41 -0500
From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, dedekind1@gmail.com,
        adrian.hunter@intel.com, jaegeuk@kernel.org, david@sigma-star.at,
        wd@denx.de, sbabic@denx.de, dengler@linutronix.de, ebiggers@google.com,
        mhalcrow@google.com, hch@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/29] UBIFS File Encryption v1
Message-ID: <20161127175241.ojvqnla4zn5mkg63@thunk.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        dedekind1@gmail.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com, jaegeuk@kernel.org,
        david@sigma-star.at, wd@denx.de, sbabic@denx.de,
        dengler@linutronix.de, ebiggers@google.com, mhalcrow@google.com,
        hch@infradead.org
References: <1479072072-6844-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at>
 <20161114030548.eils5al7ugfhlqwg@thunk.org>
 <34885683-a40f-eaff-b99d-b11fc68803f7@nod.at>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <34885683-a40f-eaff-b99d-b11fc68803f7@nod.at>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20161104 (1.7.1)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@thunk.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on imap.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 431
Lines: 11

On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 09:18:12AM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> 
> Do you want us to address Eric's review comments on top of the fscrypt
> branch or shall we rebase?
> I'd suggest the former.

Yes, let's address them on top of the existing fscrypt branch.  I
don't consider any of his comments super-serious --- they were mostly
documentation or comments level changes unless I missed something.

	      	 	  		       - Ted